Mehta, Shailendra RajKasilingam, DharunMehta, RooshabhYagnik, ShaileshVani, Vina2024-02-102024-02-102021http://ir.mica.ac.in/handle/123456789/7856Furthermore, to understand India’s full diversity, one must analyze District level data since this diversity is lost at the State and National levels. But then another problem presents itself. The number and geographic definition of the Districts changes from time to time, both when new states are formed, as was the case with Telangana, and also when there is an administrative reorganization, which happens somewhere the other on a fairly regular basis. Therefore, the source, the frequency, and the geography of the data must all be harmonized. Further, from the large mass of data that is available, a meaningful choice must be made. In this Report, we have curated 62 carefully selected variables for each of India’s 600+ districts. This gives us over 40,000 pieces of individual data that have to be presented in a meaningful form. For this, we had to draw upon data presentation techniques. All this was made possible by the deep experience of the MICA team, which has put together this Report. Several members of this team have been working on these datasets for over two decades each. This expertise was acquired in curating one of India’s largest socio-economic data repositories Ð which is the MIMI database at MICA. Currently, this has data on over 10,000 separate variables, from which the 62 have been chosen. The MICA Socio-Economic Report 2021 is in line with MICAÕs mission of being at the forefront of Strategic Marketing and Communication Management.enindividual data for each stateagricultural indicatorscommercial indicatorsdemographic indicatorsindustrial indicatorsmode of transportationreligion indicatorscensus of india 2011social indicatorsfinancial indicatorshouseholds with basic amenitiescomparison of variables across districtsDataset